Mastering 26AS Reconciliation

Mastering 26AS Reconciliation: Proven Ways to make it a Breeze

Understanding the Need for Mastering 26AS Reconciliation

In recent years tax regulations have undergone humongous change. Many of these are being done with the intention of ensuring that all the transactions are duly reported to the Income Tax. Mastering 26AS Reconciliation amidst these evolving regulations.

Department (IT Department). With the help of this information, the IT Department will be able to analyze and catch hold of tax evaders.

Decoding Section 194Q: Mastering 26AS Reconciliation Amidst TDS On Goods

One such change is the introduction of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) on the purchase of goods vide Section 194Q of the Income Tax Act (IT Act). The introduction of the same has resulted in flooding of the TDS entries in Form 26AS. It is a form which captures details of the TDS deducted and reported for a particular Taxpayer. Further, the IT Department relies on this form before allowing the TDS refund or adjustment of TDS against Income Tax liabilities. Therefore, it has indirectly become mandatory on the part of the Taxpayer to ensure that the Deductor has reported all the TDS in its Form 26AS. However, to identify the same one needs to first identify the Deductor who has not reported the same. Therefore, it has become necessary to reconcile Form 26AS.

However, Reconcile with what other data source?? There are two options 1) TDS ledger and 2) Sales Register. Let’s try to understand how each of these ways works and which one to select for your organization.

1) 26AS v/s TDS Ledger (Approach 1)

In this way, Form 26AS of Taxpayer is reconciled with the TDS receivable ledger maintained by the Taxpayer. This is a direct approach where we are comparing two different data sets capturing the same information.

2) 26AS v/s Sales Register (Approach 2)

In this way, Form 26AS is compared with what TDS should have been deducted for each and every sales line item. Assuming that the Tax Deductor has diligently deducted the TDS, this is an indirect way.

Both approaches have their benefits and drawbacks, so organizations should choose the one that best suits their needs. Below are the areas which one should consider before choosing the approach:

A) Timing of booking of TDS receivable

Most organizations book TDS Receivable at the time of payment receipt. So while doing reconciliation there will also be a date mismatch and in the scenario where there are ‘000s of line items, this becomes difficult to handle when we are opting for Approach 1. However, if linking of payment with invoice is available then Approach 1 can become very easy to implement.

If the organization books TDS Receivable on an ad hoc basis, it shall opt for Approach 2, provided all the other details are available.

B) Reporting pattern of Tax Deductor

Are the Tax Deductor reporting on the basis of the actual date or are they either putting the date of the end of the month or the end of the quarter? Accordingly, one shall select the approach of reconciliation. If the Tax Deductor is clubbing the amount for the quarter or month and just reporting a single line item then in that case just a TAN level month-wise or quarter-wise reconciliation will suffice.

C) Availability of TDS rate for each sales line item

Approach 2 is possible only when one has proper records of the TDS rate applicable on each sales invoice or each line item of the sales invoice. In many cases, when billing services and goods in a single invoice, each line item of the invoice will have a different TDS rate.

Hence, it is crucial to exercise precision when choosing an approach. Selecting the wrong method can elongate the activity and potentially result in repetition.

Future-Proofing Your Finances: Mastering 26AS Reconciliation for Long-Term Compliance

Organizations can also evaluate various software which are available to automate 26AS reconciliation. One such solution is provided by Firmway. Firmway’s 26AS reconciliation software provides both the approach as mentioned above. Moreover, it also provides the option of line level as well as TAN level reconciliation. To know more about Firmway’s 26AS Reconciliation Click here.

Step-by-Step Mastery of Section 194Q

Step-by-Step Mastery of Section 194Q: Your Expert Guide

Background

Business returns constitute less than 2% of overall Income Tax Returns filed in India for AY 2021-22, underscoring the pressing need for Step-by-Step Mastery of Section 194Q. Furthermore, clearly indicating evasion of taxes. To combat tax evasions and non-filing of returns, the Indian government has expanded TDS and TCS provisions in the past two years.

The government is working towards bringing dividends, purchases, sales, e-commerce operators, etc., all under the scope of TDS and TCS as it makes tracking transactions easier. Specifically, the TDS/TCS provisions on purchases and sales are redefining steps for India’s taxation system.

Mastering Section 194Q: Gaining Proficiency in Step-by-Step Mastery of Section 194Q and Understanding Its Impact

Section 194Q, introduced under the Finance Act, 2021, effective from 1st July 2021, aims to curb tax evasions and fraud. Additionally, it mandates that buyers with turnovers exceeding Rs 10 crores in the preceding financial year deduct tax on purchases over Rs 50 lakhs, given the seller’s Indian residency.

Moreover, with 194Q in effect, all high-volume sale/purchase transactions will come under record, thereby significantly reducing the chances of evasions. However, these provisions inevitably add to the concerns of the CFOs and tax heads of large-scale companies in terms of its implementation and reporting.

Challenges faced by large-scale companies are:

Since large-scale companies have a high volume of sales and purchases both, availing of accurate TDS credits as well as deducting vendor TDS get wearisome for tax and finance teams.

Year-on-year locking of tax credits is a common problem among large-scale enterprises. Errors in availing of TDS credits and deducting TDS affect working capital efficiencies and invite tax scrutiny.

The process of maintaining vendor records, obtaining low tax deduction certificates, tracking vendor payments, availing TDS/TCS credits, reconciling 26 AS, etc., is voluminous and time-consuming, especially when done manually.

Thus, finance and direct tax teams should find the automation and technology-enabled solutions. 

Streamlining Compliance with Section 194Q through Step-by-Step Automation

Technology and automation simplify the process of deducting, availing, and reconciling TDS/TCS, making Step-by-Step Mastery of Section 194Q easier. To avail complete TDS and TCS credits, reconciling 26 AS and maintaining accurate books of accounts is essential. Traditionally, companies reconcile 26AS at year-end as a post-mortem exercise, often resulting in credit losses. Companies should aim to perform this reconciliation quarterly.

Automation enables companies to incorporate reconciliation into their regular assessments. This, in turn, helps in proactive communication with vendors and reduces the risk of working capital shortages and credit losses.

One such software that assists 26 AS reconciliations is Firmway. It is a web-based SaaS software designed to streamline time-consuming reconciliations. Trusted by many big brands in India, it simplifies the reconciliation process for bulky 26 AS entries and books of accounts. It offers features such as PAN-TAN linking, automated reconciliation, and communication of differences. Thus, it makes accommodating new tax norms like 194Q trouble-free.

Conclusion

The Indian government is taking steps to make the country more tax-compliant, and large businesses should assist. Technology helps companies to abide by new tax laws swiftly. Regarding 26 AS reconciliations, automation helps highlight unresolved items and provides data-driven insights to CFOs. Hence, companies should adopt technology and automation software to contribute to building a tax-compliant economy.

//roi calculator back calculations